History,  Nationalism,  Race

German Guilt is Based on Fake News (Part 4)

Read the headline, and the sub-head and then the date. This is March 24,1933 and the Daily Express is reporting a concerted effort by Jews around the world, including powerful Jewish financial interests, to boycott German goods with the aim of crippling the country’s already precarious economy.

Its Special Political Correspondent correctly says they had, in effect “declared war” on Germany.

He could hardly have missed the story because on March 12 the American Jewish congress announced a massive protest at Madison Square Gardens for March 27 and the day before, on March 23, 20,000 Jews protested at New York’s City Hall and rallies were staged outside the North German Lloyd and Hamburg-American shipping lines. Boycotts were also mounted against German goods throughout shops and businesses in New York City.

The article described a forthcoming “holy war” in which Jews everywhere were urged to boycott German goods and engage in mass demonstrations against German economic interests. According to the Express:

The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German persecutors of their fellow believers.
The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler’s people.

The Express said that Germany was “now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry…. In London, New York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade.”

So what, you ask, prompted this religious and racial attack on Germany? It’s true, Adolf Hitler had been appointed Chancellor on January 30, 1933 but he was not running the government and no National Socialist policies against the Jews, or anyone else, had been enacted. This was clearly a premptive effort to topple Hitler before he could take power.

Meanwhile, the Jews in Germany were horrified. If the international campaign against Germany gained any traction, they would be the immediate losers. As a result,The Zionist Association of Germany put out a telegram on the 26th of March—two days after the Express article—rejecting many of the allegations made against the National Socialists as “propaganda,” “mendacious” and “sensational.”

No matter; the big rally at the Gardens went ahead and 40,000 Jews showed up to shout support for the boycott and opposition to Germany. The “This is Zionism” website takes up the story:

“Hitler himself responded to the Jewish boycott and the threats in a speech on March 28 – four days after the original Jewish declaration of war – saying:

Now that the domestic enemies of the nation have been eliminated by the Volk itself, what we have long been waiting for will not come to pass.

The Communist and Marxist criminals and their Jewish-intellectual instigators, who, having made off with their capital stocks across the border in the nick of time, are now unfolding an unscrupulous, treasonous campaign of agitation against the German Volk as a whole from there….

Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity are being launched about Germany. Horror stories of dismembered Jewish corpses, gouged out eyes and hacked off hands are circulating for the purpose of defaming the German Volk in the world for the second time, just as they had succeeded in doing once before in 1914.

Thus, the fact—one conveniently left out of nearly all histories on the subject—is that Hitler’s March 28, 1933 boycott order was in direct response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide Jewish leadership just four days earlier.” This is Zionism continues:

“To understand Hitler’s reaction to the Jewish declaration of war, it is vital to understand the critical state of the German economy at the time. In 1933, the German economy was in a shambles. Some 3 million Germans were on public assistance with a total of 6 million unemployed. Hyper-inflation had destroyed the economic vitality of the German nation. Furthermore, the anti-German propaganda pouring out of the global press strengthened the resolve of Germany’s enemies, especially the Poles and their hawkish military high command.

The Jewish leaders were not bluffing. The boycott was an act of war not solely in metaphor: it was a means, well crafted, to destroy Germany as a political, social and economic entity. The long term purpose of the Jewish boycott against Germany was to bankrupt her with respect to the reparation payments imposed on Germany after World War I and to keep Germany demilitarized and vulnerable.”

All of this, I repeat, ALL of this, was prior to the restrictive laws, the seizure of goods, the forced labour camps. Indeed, had Jews outside Germany searched for a better way to isolate their co-religionists inside the country, they could hardly have hit on a more powerful weapon.

This context shows Germany’s anti-Jewish measures, later under Hitler and during the war, were in response to a campaign launched against Germany by the Jews. Indeed, blaming Germany for its response became part of the campaign itself.

This is all very clever: a boycott, then blaming the German response as a reason for the boycott; it’s the very definition of fake news.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *